- Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster agreed to a settlement, which must be reviewed by the court, with the following terms:
- The publishers will
go back to the wholesale model andallow retailers to set their own prices for eBooks. Update: Publishers Lunch Direct has clarified the situation (and given the actual verbiage in the settlement, I use the word "clarified" advisedly.) The three publishers will be allowed to continue to offer agency contracts, and they can use variable commissions and discounts to encourage resellers to limit their discounting of eBooks to consumers. However, they can't prohibit resellers from offering discounts. Publishers Lunch Direct claims that this clause prohibits resellers from selling eBooks below the retail price less commission set by the publishers, but I don't read it that way: Resellers can sell eBooks at any price they choose and take as much of a loss as they want. In addition, resellers can refuse to purchase on agency terms, but publishers can refuse to sell to them.
- They will terminate their "Most Favored Nation" agreements with Apple, Amazon, Barnes & Noble and other eBook retailers.
- They're prohibited from placing constraints on resellers' ability to offer discounts on eBooks for two years.
- They're prohibited from conspiring or sharing competitively sensitive information with their competitors for five years.
- They must implement a strong antitrust compliance program.
- Justice charges that the defendants held regular, near-quarterly meetings to discuss confidential business and competitive matters as part of a conspiracy to raise, fix and stabilize retail prices.
- They also mutually agreed to seize pricing authority from resellers, agreed to pay Apple a 30% commission on eBooks sold through the iBookstore (and to impose the same 30% on other resellers,) and used most-favored-nation provisions to guarantee that no reseller could sell their eBooks at a price lower than Apple's.
- According to the statement, "...one CEO allegedly went so far as to encourage an e-book retailer to punish another publisher for not engaging in these illegal practices."
- Acting Assistant Attorney General Sharis A. Pozen quoted from the complaint as follows: "One executive said that, 'the goal is less to compete with Amazon as to force it to accept a price level higher than 9.99.' And yet another said, 'we’ve always known that unless other publishers follow us, there’s no chance of success in getting Amazon to change its pricing practices.' Our complaint also quotes Apple’s then-CEO Steve Jobs as saying, 'the customer pays a little more, but that’s what you [he’s referring to the publishers here] want anyway.' As you can see, we allege that these executives knew full well what they were doing. That is, taking steps to make sure the prices consumers paid for e-books were higher."
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
It's On: U.S. Justice Department sues Apple and five publishers for eBook price-fixing, settles with three of the publishers
The long-rumored eBook price-fixing lawsuit against Apple and five of the Big 6 publishers (Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster) was filed in Federal court in New York today by the U.S. Justice Department. In addition, the Attorneys General from Texas, Connecticut, Ohio and Pennsylvania are filing their own lawsuits today in Federal court in Texas. Here's a summary of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's remarks: