Thursday, June 21, 2012
CBS tells it like it is--most reality TV is unwatchable crap
CBS hits ABC's "Dancing With the Stars" right on the mark--but the shot then ricochets and hits CBS square in the chest. "Dancing With the Stars" is inane, but so is "Big Brother," which is all but unwatchable. For that matter, most reality television in the U.S. is pitched at developmentally-stunted young adults. Go down the list: "Survivor"? Entertaining once, but way past its prime. "American Idol"? The show's gotten to the point where no amount of cast changes is likely to reverse its slide. "The X Factor"? Mean-spirited and insipid at the same time. "The Bachelor/The Bachelorette"? The only way I could watch those shows is on a Demerol drip. And that's just the "first tier" of reality shows--with few exceptions, the rest are much, much worse.
As for "original concepts," it's important to remember that CBS didn't create "Big Brother"--they licensed it from Endemol. "Survivor" is a licensed version of a Swedish reality show called "Expedition Robinson." Fox's "American Idol" is based on the British show "Pop Idol," and "The X Factor" also came from the U.K. and is licensed from Simon Cowell and his company SYCOtv. ABC's "Dancing With the Stars" is based on the BBC's "Strictly Come Dancing." NBC's "The Voice" is based on "The Voice of Holland." You get the picture: When it comes to reality shows, U.S. networks don't create them--they buy them.
I have no idea whether CBS can prevail in court against ABC, but given the ratings for the first episode of "Glass House," it'll likely be off the air well before the case makes it to trial. To me, the whole thing is like saying "Your steaming pile of crap looks and smells just like my steaming pile of crap!" Yes, it does.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
The New Medium: One Perspective
Michael Wolff,Vanity Fair,user-generated contemt,UGC,reality television
In the March, 2008 edition of Vanity Fair magazine, Michael Wolff addresses the decline of the film and television industries as a result of the wholesale shift away from plot-driven narratives. I'll pull one quote from the article that summarizes his point:
"...nobody, writers or executives, remotely has an idea about how to do what they do, how to apply their trade—creating these elaborate, hoary, three-act or four-act divided-at-the-midpoint stories—in a new form with a new means of distribution for an audience that seems more and more to want some radically different thing."
Wolff isn't quite sure what that "radically different thing" is, and neither am I. He lumps together reality television, user-generated content and videogames, when those are different forms (although one can argue that that reality TV and UGC are often more alike than different.) Writers aren't going away, but what they write is changing dramatically. Will the three-act form finally go the way of the dodo?