The Digital Reader reports that Rakuten's launch of the Kobo Touch in
Japan isn't going quite as expected. Despite the company's "Kill Amazon"
chest-beating a few weeks ago, actual customers aren't thrilled about
the Kobo Touch eReader. Reviews on the website gave the eReader an
average rating of 2.96 out of 5, and reviews were fairly equally split
between four stars and one star. I'm using the past tense because
Rakuten took the entire review page off its website. Reviews of the
eReader complained about "...crashing setup of kobo desktop application,
very limited offer of Japanese books, unresponsive touch screens, poor
customer service, etc."
To be fair, the Kobo Touch has only been on sale in Japan for a week,
and there are almost always problems at launch. However, the Kobo Touch
isn't a new product--it's been shipping for more than a year. Rakuten
may have believed that its dominance of the Japanese eCommerce market
would allow it to quickly build comparable dominance of the country's
eBook market. However, if they don't fix the problems with the
Japanese-language Kobo Touch quickly, what's more likely is that they'll
either kill the domestic eBook market or hand it to Amazon.
Showing posts with label Electronic commerce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electronic commerce. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Monday, July 02, 2012
Tablets now generate more eCommerce traffic than smartphones
As more evidence that tablets are overtaking smartphones as devices of
preference for mobile Internet users, GigaOm reports on a new study of more than 100 million online shopping transactions by Monetate. The
company determined that tablets represented 6.52% of traffic to
eCommerce sites in Q1 2012, overtaking smartphones (with 5.35%) for the
first time. Tablet traffic increased 348% in the last year, while
smartphone traffic increased 117%. 95% of the tablet traffic was from
iPads. These numbers compare with a forecast from Adobe that overall
tablet traffic worldwide won't exceed that from smartphones until early
2013, and will represent 10% of website traffic in early 2014. GigaOm
suggests that the reason for the difference between Monetate and Adobe
is that Monetate measures eCommerce traffic, while Adobe is counting all
traffic, including traffic to content sites.
Tablets are also much more efficient at converting sales than smartphones: In Q1, visits from PCs converted into sales 3.51% of the time, while visits from tablets converted at a 3.23% rate, and visits from smartphones converted at a 1.39% rate. Other measures, such as pages viewed per session and items added to carts, are also much closer between PCs and tablets than between either PCs or tablets and smartphones. The reasons most likely are the bigger displays and keyboards on tablets.
Tablets are also much more efficient at converting sales than smartphones: In Q1, visits from PCs converted into sales 3.51% of the time, while visits from tablets converted at a 3.23% rate, and visits from smartphones converted at a 1.39% rate. Other measures, such as pages viewed per session and items added to carts, are also much closer between PCs and tablets than between either PCs or tablets and smartphones. The reasons most likely are the bigger displays and keyboards on tablets.
Labels:
Adobe,
Electronic commerce,
iPad,
Monetate,
Smartphone,
Tablet computer,
website traffic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)