The Taipei Times reports that E Ink, the supplier of the electrophoretic displays used
in most black & white eReaders, released its second quarter
financial results yesterday. Revenues were approximately $149.5
million, down 35.37% from $231.3 million a year earlier. Gross margins
were 0.6% vs. 32.5% a year ago. The company posted a net loss of $27.3
million vs. $26.3 million a year ago.
The fact that gross margins have collapsed (they were 1.1% in Q1)
suggests that eReader manufacturers are putting tremendous pressure on E
Ink to lower the price of its displays, and E Ink can't drive its
manufacturing costs down fast enough to compensate. The Taipei Times
report doesn't indicate how many eReader displays E Ink shipped, so it's
difficult to figure out how to read the decline in revenue--but it's
likely a combination of lower sale prices and lower demand.
Surveys in the U.S. suggest that the market for eReaders has peaked, and
that color tablets will likely take the majority of the market in units over the next 12 months. (They already represent more revenues than eReaders.) There's still probably
several years of life in the worldwide black & white eReader market.
However, according to the article, E Ink will focus on other, more
profitable applications for its displays, such as shelf price displays
for supermarkets and convenience stores.
Showing posts with label Gross margin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gross margin. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 07, 2012
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Apple's U.S. margins for iPad about half those of iPhone
As part of the myriad lawsuits between Apple and Samsung, Reuters reports that a statement
from an Apple expert witness in a case going to trial in San Jose
reveals Apple's margins on the iPhone and iPad. According to the
statement, between April 2010 and the end of March 2012, Apple's gross
margins on U.S. iPhone sales were 49% to 58%, generating revenues of
more than $33 billion, while gross margins on iPad sales were 23% to
32%, generating revenues of more than $13 billion. The numbers reflect
the fact that iPhone prices are heavily subsidized by mobile carriers,
while most iPads are sold without broadband connectivity and are thus
unsubsidized. Apple has chosen to accept lower margins on iPads in order
to avoid creating a price umbrella for competitors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)